ADI Lab is the research division of AntiDetect Insider. We publish the method, the raw data, and the limitations behind our browser rankings. The lab is self-published and reader-supported; it is not an external certification body.
Latest report: 2026 ADI Lab Multi-Account Browser Benchmark — published December 15, 2025; updated September 30, 2026.
What we measure
- Fingerprint consistency: 47 checks covering browser identity, display, locale, graphics, fonts, hardware, network, permissions, media, automation artifacts, transport, and profile isolation.
- Account survival: 90-day Facebook and Instagram outcomes across 12,800 profiles.
- Performance: cold-start launch time, RAM per profile, and stable concurrency.
- Practical fit: pricing, seats, proxies, automation, and the workflows each browser actually supports.
How we report it
- Check-level and full-profile pass rates separately. A 97.8% check-level rate is not the same as a 97.8% full-profile rate.
- Confidence intervals and limitations. The top-three ban-rate differences are directional, not decisive.
- Raw data and scripts. The aggregate table, profile-level CSV, check definitions, and reference harness are public.
- Competitor advantages. The report says where Octo, Multilogin, AdsPower, Dolphin, Kameleo, BitBrowser, and ixBrowser are stronger.
Recent notes
- Why we report check-level and full-profile pass rates separately
- What a 90-day ban rate can and cannot tell you
- Proxy latency dominates most launch-time differences