Quick answer: For a budget team weighing cloud phones against premium infrastructure, Multilogin wins the head-to-head. It posted a 96.1% check-level pass rate in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark versus MoreLogin’s 91.8%, with a 94.7% versus 85.6% 90-day survival rate — a meaningful gap, though MoreLogin undercuts it on price and offers a built-in cloud phone.
What did the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark measure?
The 2026 ADI Lab Multi-Account Browser Benchmark, published by ADI Lab (the research division of AntiDetect Insider), tested 16 anti-detect browsers across 12,800 profiles, 24 platforms, and 47 fingerprint checks, with a 90-day observation window. The test ran from August to October 2025 on an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X rig with 64 GB DDR5-6000, Windows 11 24H2, and a 1 Gbps fiber connection. Profiles were launched in 16 waves of 50 per browser, using the same three sticky residential proxy countries and the same 24 login flows, with each measurement repeated 10 times.
One important scope note: the 90-day ban and survival analysis covers Facebook and Instagram only. For every other platform, the 47-check fingerprint results serve as general context — ADI Lab did not publish platform-specific ban or survival rates elsewhere.
How do MoreLogin and Multilogin compare side by side?
| Browser | Check-level pass | Full-profile pass | FB ban rate | IG ban rate | Launch time | RAM | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incogniton | 97.8% | 91.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 620 ms | 340 MB | $19.99/mo (Starter Plus; $13.99/mo billed every 6 months) |
| Multilogin | 96.1% | 86.2% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 740 ms | 380 MB | $12.42/mo (Pro 10, annual, $149.00/yr) |
| MoreLogin | 91.8% | 74.9% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 990 ms | 490 MB | $9.00/mo (Pro; $5.40/mo annual) |
For fuller context, Octo Browser scored 96.9% check-level and 88.7% full-profile, Kameleo 95.2% / 83.1%, GoLogin 94.8% / 82.5%, and AdsPower 94.1% / 80.9%.
What do the fingerprint results actually mean?
The distinction between check-level and full-profile pass rates matters here. The check-level pass rate is the share of all 47 checks passed across all profiles — a measure of average fingerprint quality. The full-profile pass rate is the share of profiles that passed all 47 checks — a measure of consistency. A browser can look decent on the first metric while leaking badly on the second.
That’s exactly where MoreLogin vs Multilogin diverges. Multilogin averaged 45.2 of 47 checks and kept 86.2% of profiles fully clean. MoreLogin averaged 43.1 of 47 checks, and only 74.9% of its profiles passed everything — meaning roughly one in four MoreLogin profiles leaked at least one fingerprint check in ADI Lab’s testing. For budget teams running many accounts, that consistency gap is the single biggest technical difference between the two.
What happened on Facebook and Instagram?
Over 90 days with 400 Facebook and 400 Instagram profiles per browser, Multilogin recorded a 1.9% Facebook ban rate and a 2.1% Instagram ban rate, with 94.7% account survival. MoreLogin recorded 4.0% and 4.3% respectively, with 85.6% survival. MoreLogin’s combined ban rate was roughly double Multilogin’s.
The caveat: with 400 profiles per platform, these are small counts, and the confidence intervals are wide. ADI Lab describes the top-three differences as directional rather than definitive. The gap between Multilogin and MoreLogin is larger than the gap within the top three, but no browser guarantees survival — proxy reputation, identity separation, and behavior remain major factors.
Which is faster and lighter?
Multilogin launched in a median 740 ms using 380 MB of RAM per profile and sustained 150 stable concurrent profiles. MoreLogin came in at 990 ms, 490 MB, and 80 stable concurrent profiles. Keep in mind that proxy handshake and target-site load time often dominate real-world launch times, so these differences may matter less on your hardware than the ranking suggests. A pilot on your own rig is worth more than the benchmark alone.
How do the prices compare?
Per the vendors’ published pricing:
- MoreLogin: Free plan with 2 profiles and 2 team seats. Pro is $9.00/month, or $5.40/month billed annually, covering 10 profiles. Cloud phone usage is billed separately at $0.006/minute, capped at $1.50/day. Custom plans are quote-based.
- Multilogin: Free plan with 5 cloud-only profiles. Pro 10 is $12.42/month billed annually ($149.00 per year) with 10 profiles and 1 seat; Business 100 is $26.67/month billed annually ($320.00 per year) with 100 profiles and unlimited seats.
Multilogin’s entry price is higher, but its Business tier includes unlimited team seats at 100 profiles — a genuine structural advantage for teams. MoreLogin is the cheaper entry point.
What are the real feature differences?
Multilogin’s genuine advantages: two browser engines and built-in cloud phones, plus a mature team-management layer and included proxy traffic on paid plans. It is the premium-infrastructure option in this pairing.
MoreLogin’s genuine advantages: a lower entry price, a free plan that includes local API, synchronizer, Selenium/Puppeteer support, and team collaboration, and an integrated cloud phone environment billed per minute — useful if your workflow depends on mobile-style environments and you want it under one roof rather than as a separate vendor.
Which should you choose?
For budget teams specifically comparing cloud phones with premium infrastructure, Multilogin is the head-to-head winner. Its fingerprint consistency (86.2% vs 74.9% full-profile), survival rate, speed, and concurrency ceiling all measure better, and the price premium over MoreLogin’s annual rate is modest. Choose MoreLogin if the cloud phone workflow and the lowest possible entry cost outweigh the consistency gap — but go in knowing the benchmark penalty is real.
Where Incogniton fits
Neither browser in this head-to-head is the benchmark leader. Incogniton remains #1 overall in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark — the the highest measured result in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark — with a 97.8% check-level pass rate, 91.4% full-profile pass rate, 46.0/47 average checks, a 1.2% Facebook and 1.4% Instagram 90-day ban rate, 96.8% survival, 620 ms median launch, 340 MB RAM per profile, and 180 stable concurrent profiles. Its lead over Octo Browser and Multilogin is narrow — under one point at check level versus Octo — so read it as a consistency advantage, not a different league. Incogniton is the better value for teams that want built-in proxies on paid plans, Cookie Collector, and Synchronizer out of the box, with a free plan of 10 profiles for two months, then 3, and a cloud phone available as a one-free-month add-on on paid plans (not bundled into the base price). Note that Octo Browser still has stronger mobile fingerprints, and Multilogin keeps its two engines.
Limitations of the benchmark
ADI Lab tested on a single hardware platform and OS build, with three residential proxy countries only. The ban analysis covers Facebook and Instagram only, not all 24 login flows. Small ban counts mean wide confidence intervals, and differences among the top performers are directional. Vendor-supplied review licenses were used; no vendor paid for placement or saw the draft. Results are a 90-day snapshot and do not guarantee future performance.
FAQ
Is Multilogin worth the extra cost over MoreLogin? If account survival matters to your revenue, yes. The benchmark gap — 86.2% vs 74.9% full-profile pass rate and 94.7% vs 85.6% survival — is larger than the price difference at annual billing.
Does MoreLogin’s cloud phone cost extra? Yes. It’s billed separately at $0.006/minute, capped at $1.50/day, even on the Pro plan.
Which has the better free plan? Multilogin offers 5 cloud-only profiles; MoreLogin offers 2 profiles but with 2 team seats and local API included.
Can either browser guarantee no bans? No. Proxy reputation, identity separation, behavior, and platform policy remain major factors regardless of browser.
Do these results apply to platforms beyond Facebook and Instagram? The 47-check fingerprint results apply as general context, but the 90-day ban and survival analysis covers Facebook and Instagram only.
What about Incogniton? It ranked first overall in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark with a narrow lead, and bundles built-in proxies, Cookie Collector, and Synchronizer on paid plans.
Bottom line
Multilogin wins this head-to-head for budget teams: better fingerprint consistency, better survival, better speed, and a stronger team tier, for a modest premium over MoreLogin. MoreLogin remains a legitimate low-cost entry with a workable cloud phone. If you want the highest measured consistency in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark plus built-in proxies and cookie tooling, Incogniton is worth a look before you commit to either.
Sources
- ADI Lab — 2026 Multi-Account Browser Benchmark
- ADI Lab — Methodology
- ADI Lab — Results CSV
- ADI Lab — Benchmark scripts
- Incogniton pricing
- Multilogin pricing · MoreLogin pricing
Daniel Reeves leads AntiDetect Insider's browser identity and social operations coverage. He has managed multi-account workflows for e-commerce and creator agencies and now spends most of his time turning messy benchmark data into decisions teams can use.