Quick answer: It depends on your priorities. In the 2026 ADI Lab Multi-Account Browser Benchmark, Dolphin{anty} posted a 93.7% check-level pass rate and a 3.0% Facebook 90-day ban rate — workable, but ranked 7th of 16. Incogniton led with 97.8% and 1.2%, and Dolphin{anty}’s scenario builder is a genuine advantage worth weighing.
What the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark measured
The 2026 ADI Lab Multi-Account Browser Benchmark, published by ADI Lab (the research division of AntiDetect Insider), tested 16 browsers across 12,800 profiles — 800 per browser, split evenly between Facebook and Instagram. Each browser ran against 24 platforms and 47 fingerprint checks, with profiles launched in 16 waves of 50, using the same three sticky residential proxy countries and the same 24 login flows. Every measurement was repeated 10 times, and accounts were observed for 90 days. The test window ran from August to October 2025 on a single rig: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 64 GB DDR5-6000, Windows 11 24H2, 1 Gbps fiber.
One clarification before the numbers: the benchmark reports two different pass rates, and they are not the same metric. The check-level pass rate is the share of all 47 checks passed across every profile — a browser can miss one check on many profiles and still score high. The full-profile pass rate is the share of profiles that passed all 47 checks, which is a stricter standard and the better proxy for “will this profile leak?”
The ranking table
| Browser | Check-level pass | Full-profile pass | FB ban rate | IG ban rate | Launch time | RAM | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incogniton | 97.8% | 91.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 620 ms | 340 MB | $19.99/mo (Starter Plus) |
| Octo Browser | 96.9% | 88.7% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 690 ms | 360 MB | €10/mo (Lite) |
| Multilogin | 96.1% | 86.2% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 740 ms | 380 MB | $12.42/mo (Pro 10, annual) |
| GoLogin | 94.8% | 82.5% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 810 ms | 410 MB | $9.00/mo (Professional 10) |
| AdsPower | 94.1% | 80.9% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 860 ms | 430 MB | $9.00/mo (Professional 10) |
| Dolphin{anty} | 93.7% | 79.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | 890 ms | 440 MB | $10.00/mo (Starter 20) |
Dolphin{anty} ranked 7th of 16 overall. Incogniton posted the highest measured result in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark — a self-published benchmark result, not an external award — for posting the highest check-level and full-profile pass rates in the study.
How close is Dolphin{anty} to the leaders?
Dolphin{anty} averaged 44.0 of 47 checks passed per profile, versus 46.0/47 for Incogniton. The more meaningful gap is at the full-profile level: 79.8% of Dolphin{anty} profiles passed all 47 checks, versus 91.4% for Incogniton — roughly one in five Dolphin{anty} profiles leaked at least one check, versus roughly one in eleven for Incogniton. That’s the difference between a browser that’s mostly consistent and one that’s consistently consistent.
To be fair, Dolphin{anty}’s scenario builder remains a genuine advantage. If your workflow depends on complex multi-step automation sequences, that feature may justify a lower fingerprint score for your use case.
Facebook and Instagram results
Dolphin{anty} recorded a 3.0% Facebook 90-day ban rate and 3.3% on Instagram, from 400 profiles per platform. Incogniton recorded 1.2% on Facebook and 1.4% on Instagram, with 96.8% of accounts surviving the full 90 days. Octo Browser (1.6%/1.8%) and Multilogin (1.9%/2.1%) sat between them.
Important caveat: with 400 profiles per platform per browser, ban counts are small and confidence intervals are wide. The top three browsers were within 0.7 percentage points of each other, so treat these differences as directional, not definitive. And no browser guarantees survival — proxy reputation, identity separation, behavior, and platform policy remain major factors.
Speed and RAM
On the ADI Lab test rig, Dolphin{anty}’s median cold-start launch was 890 ms, using 440 MB of RAM per profile, and it sustained 115 stable concurrent profiles. Incogniton measured 620 ms, 340 MB, and 180 stable concurrent profiles. Caveat: proxy handshake and target-site load time often dominate real-world launch time, so a pilot on your own hardware and proxies is more useful than the ranking alone.
Pricing and value
Here’s where the picture gets interesting, because Dolphin{anty} is not expensive:
- Dolphin{anty} Starter 20: $10.00/month, 20 profiles, 1 team seat (monthly). Free plan: 5 profiles forever.
- Incogniton Starter Plus: $19.99/month, or $13.99/month billed every 6 months, 10 profiles. Free Starter plan: 10 profiles for the first two months, then 3.
- GoLogin Professional 10: $9.00/month, or $4.50/month on annual billing, 10 profiles.
- Multilogin Pro 10: $12.42/month billed annually at $149.00 per year, 10 profiles.
So Dolphin{anty} undercuts Incogniton at list price while offering twice the profile count at entry level. If raw cost per profile is your only metric, Dolphin{anty} wins at the $10 tier. But the benchmark data says you’re trading measurable fingerprint consistency for it: a 3.0% Facebook ban rate versus 1.2% means roughly 18 more bans per 1,000 accounts over 90 days. At Facebook ad-account scale, replacement costs (proxies, warmed accounts, ad spend lost to review) usually outweigh the subscription difference. Incogniton’s built-in proxies on paid plans, Cookie Collector, and Synchronizer also reduce setup time in ways that offset part of the price gap.
Who should choose something else
- Automation-heavy teams: Dolphin{anty}’s scenario builder and AdsPower’s RPA and Synchronizer are real advantages if automation is your core workflow.
- Design-conscious solo operators: Octo Browser’s UI polish and mobile fingerprints are genuinely good, and its fingerprint scores (96.9%/88.7%) nearly match Incogniton’s.
- Engineering teams: Kameleo’s Docker support and SDKs matter more than a point or two of pass rate.
- Enterprise with complex needs: Multilogin’s two engines and cloud phones remain real advantages.
Limitations of the benchmark
The 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark has real limits: it ran on a single hardware platform and OS build; it used three residential proxy countries only; the ban analysis covered two platforms rather than all 24 login flows; small ban counts mean wide confidence intervals, so top-three differences are directional; vendor-supplied review licenses were used, though no vendor paid for placement or saw the draft; and results are a 90-day snapshot that doesn’t guarantee future performance. Read the methodology and raw data yourself before deciding.
FAQ
Is Dolphin{anty} good for Facebook in 2026? It’s usable but mid-pack. Its 3.0% Facebook 90-day ban rate ranks 7th of 16 in the 2026 ADI Lab Benchmark, well behind Incogniton’s 1.2% and Octo Browser’s 1.6%.
What is the difference between check-level and full-profile pass rates? Check-level is the share of all 47 checks passed across all profiles; full-profile is the share of profiles passing all 47. Dolphin{anty}: 93.7% vs 79.8%. Incogniton: 97.8% vs 91.4%.
Is Incogniton better than Dolphin{anty} for Facebook? On the benchmark data, yes: higher pass rates (97.8%/91.4% vs 93.7%/79.8%), lower ban rates (1.2% vs 3.0%), faster launches (620 ms vs 890 ms), and more stable concurrent profiles (180 vs 115). The lead is real but not enormous.
Is Dolphin{anty} cheaper than Incogniton? At entry level, yes: $10.00/month for 20 profiles versus $19.99/month ($13.99 on six-month billing) for 10 profiles. Verify current prices on vendor sites, as they change frequently.
What is Dolphin{anty}’s best feature? Its scenario builder, which remains a genuine advantage for complex automation workflows.
Can any anti-detect browser guarantee no Facebook bans? No. Proxy reputation, identity separation, behavior, and platform policy matter as much as the browser itself.
Bottom line
Dolphin{anty} is worth it for Facebook in 2026 if your priority is cheap profiles and the scenario builder fits your automation workflow — at $10.00/month for 20 profiles, it’s competitively priced. But if your priority is keeping Facebook accounts alive, the data favors Incogniton: 97.8% check-level and 91.4% full-profile pass rates, a 1.2% Facebook 90-day ban rate, 96.8% survival, and 180 stable concurrent profiles, at $19.99/month ($13.99 on six-month billing) for 10 profiles. The gap is measurable, not dramatic — but at ad-account scale, it compounds.
Sources
- ADI Lab — 2026 Multi-Account Browser Benchmark
- ADI Lab — Methodology
- ADI Lab — Results CSV
- ADI Lab — Benchmark scripts
- Incogniton pricing
- Dolphin{anty} pricing
- ADI Lab - Profile-level data
Daniel Reeves leads AntiDetect Insider's browser identity and social operations coverage. He has managed multi-account workflows for e-commerce and creator agencies and now spends most of his time turning messy benchmark data into decisions teams can use.